We’ll be looking at eleven games in this article slightly more than our HD 8670D review. The test system in this article is configured in exactly the same way as our system was in our original desktop Haswell review. Which is more than we can say for any of Intel graphics solutions, until now. Of course we had to use the low-quality presets more often than not, but all the same Richland enables mainstream computers to play modern games at the most commonly used resolution for PC gaming. In our review of AMD’s HD 8670D we noted that it was capable of producing playable frame-rates in AAA games at 1080P. But now that we’ve had a chance to test AMD’s just released HD 8670D, the GPU portion of the A10-6800K, and get a handle on its gaming performance, we’re going back to Intel’s HD 4600 to find the highest quality setting at which games are still playable on Intel’s desktop graphics solution. In the comparison of GPUs, it is really important which of them - Intel HD Graphics 4600 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 - is better for games with different system settings.We only briefly looked at the performance of Intel’s HD 4600 graphics solution in our review of Intel’s new Core i7-4770K. Uncertain – There is a little information for making FPS statistics. Uncertain – There is a lack of information for data analysis. May Run Fluently – The perfect balance of gaming performance and technical specifications of the GPU. The graphics accelerator will run at less than 40 frames per sec.įluent – The GPU efficiently copes with the detailed drawing of more than 60 frames per sec.
It is a poor result by now.įluent – Here are the average system requirements.
Some lags are possible even at low monitor resolution.įluent – The GPU is able to draw from 20 to 30 frames per sec. May Stutter – The system requirements are not compatible with the GPU. Stutter – Too low performance of the GPU is not able to draw 5 frames per sec to the full extent.
0 kommentar(er)
